Essay Rephraser: Free Paraphrasing Tool
How it works
If you are looking for a free essay rephraser, consider using our paraphrasing tool. This online instrument will easily change the wording in any writing piece. All you need to do is:
🔠 Essay Rephraser: When to Use?
Rephrasing is a vital academic skill that allows students and researchers to use external evidence without plagiarizing. Thus, you might often need to process many texts and render the information contained in them with content and structure tweaks.
You may need a paraphrasing tool when you are required to:
- Cite a source and explain what it’s about in your own words.
- Overview original source’s content in a more detailed way than a summary would allow.
- Combine several sources into a single text without direct quotes, giving your commentary on the content.
- Rephrase your own text for a concluding part.
Try our free tool for an effective paraphrase online. It’s the best way to complete the rephrasing task quickly and without errors.
What Is Rephrasing or Restating?
This activity presupposes delivering all important content of your original source in a substantially changed form. You should not alter the main idea or arguments of the author but render them in your words without copy-pasting any part of the text. A rephrased text contains all important messages and arguments without condensing the original content.
How to Rephrase a Sentence?
To rephrase a sentence, you need to read it closely and identify its main idea. Think of the idea by distancing yourself from the words in which it is expressed. Try to figure out a different form (other words and structure) to deliver the same idea without changing its core meaning.
How to Rephrase a Thesis?
The thesis statement contains the main idea and arguments in support of that idea, condensed into a single sentence. When you need to restate the thesis at the end of your paper, focus on the key subject and your research aim pursued throughout the paper. Reword the same idea and write it down; check whether it's coherent with the original and the paper's body content.
How to Rephrase a Paragraph?
Effective paragraph rephrasing is impossible without leaving all parts in the right places. For instance, you cannot change the topic sentence and supporting sentences' places, as each of them plays an important role in the text's coherence. Reword the topic sentence, then restructure and rephrase the supporting evidence, and repeat the conclusion in your own words. Combine it all in a reworded paragraph.
📝 Rephrase, Summarize, or Quote?
The question of how to reword the original materials you study during homework preparation is always topical. Citing sources and reporting other researchers’ findings is part and parcel of scholarship work, essay writing, and academic article production. In most cases, you will need to choose among three options:
- Direct quoting
The choice depends on several factors and the requirements for the text you need to produce. Here’s how you may tell what works best in specific cases:
|Direct quoting||Direct quotes are appropriate when you need to provide accurate information without changing the author's style or language. It may work well in literary analysis, speech analysis, or some form of political writing. It is also good to use in cases when the quote itself is the subject of analysis, so it cannot be changed or omitted.|
|Summarizing||Summaries are a good way to go when your purpose is to render the essential information from a specific source without going into too much detail. It requires restating the data in your own words and condensing the content to preserve only the core message.|
|Paraphrasing||Paraphrasing is a better variant for those who need to provide all details from the source text. Using the rephrasing method, you can preserve the content's clarity and specificity while avoiding plagiarism. Some rewriters also choose to reword content in an essay if they need to simplify the complicated vocabulary of the original source.|
🆚 Plagiarism vs. Appropriate Rephrasing
The rephrasing work comes in many forms and involves a varying degree of rewriter's input. Some students (and even professional researchers) neglect the depth of material processing required by academic standards. So, they simply cut a couple of relevant sentences from the source, do some slight rewording, and insert those fragments into their papers, which is deeply wrong.
Such paraphrasing conceals several risks for the authors:
- First, they can't achieve the required flow and consistency in their academic texts, as parts they tear from other texts just don't fit their content well enough.
- Second, they risk being accused of plagiarism because such superficial work doesn't meet the expectations of authentic academic texts.
Why Is Rephrasing Sometimes Considered Plagiarism?
Students may sometimes do some rephrasing, but their texts are still graded as plagiarized. Why does this happen?
- A slightly rephrased text remains another person's intellectual product if it is not reworked in-depth. In other words, changing a couple of words and tweaking sentences a bit is too little personal input that doesn't allow calling the text your own.
- You may forget to cite the rephrased text, which always equals plagiarism.
- You insert other people’s words into your work without tying the content coherently, thus causing the reader’s confusion and exposing your plagiarism.
How to Rephrase Correctly?
Ideally, you should focus on making appropriate paraphrases and including them in your academic texts. Here's how you can reword the source material ethically and correctly:
- Read the assigned materials carefully to elicit their meaning in full and ensure that you understand the content well.
- Write down your own interpretation of the studied material without consulting the source.
- Single out the author’s keywords that render the main ideas and points.
- Compare your version with the original and underline everything you copied word by word. Remove those parts or enclose them into quotation marks as direct quotes.
- Cite the source in-text and on the references page to give credit to the source text.
✅ Rephrasing: Bad & Better Examples
Now that we’ve dealt with the theory, it’s time to see how it all works in practice. Here are the examples of good and bad rephrasing of an excerpt taken from Carl Jung’s book Man and His Symbols.
Whoever denies the existence of the unconscious is in fact assuming that our present knowledge of the psyche is total. And this belief is clearly just as false as the assumption that we know all there is to be known about the natural universe. Our psyche is part of nature, and its enigma is as limitless. Thus we cannot define either the psyche or nature. We can merely state what we believe them to be and describe, as best we can, how they function. Quite apart, therefore, from the evidence that medical research has accumulated, there are strong grounds of logic for rejecting statements like “There is no unconscious.” Those who say such things merely express an age-old “misoneism” — a fear of the new and the unknown.
A Bad Example
Whoever refuses the existence of the unconscious presupposes that our current understanding of the psyche is complete. And this assumption is just as wrong as the idea that we know everything about the natural universe. Our psyche is inseparable from nature, and its mysteries are limitless. Thus we cannot explain the psyche or nature. We can only state what we believe them to be and describe their functions. Quite apart, therefore, from the medical studies’ evidence, there is logical evidence for rejecting claims like “There is no unconscious.” Those who say so merely support an age-old “misoneism” — prejudice against the unknown.
So, what makes this example remarkably bad?
- First, it's no attention to the paragraph's structure and syntax, which should also be altered in a good, effective paraphrase.
- Second, it's only sporadic changing of the key terminology that doesn't make any visible difference and leaves the text plagiarized.
Below is a better variant to convey the same information from Carl Jung's book.
A Better Example
Denial of the unconscious equals a claim that people have reached their limit in understanding the human psyche. This position is as wrongful as an assumption about the finite knowledge of the natural universe. It's a sphere of unlimited discovery, a part of which is the psyche, so none of them can be clearly defined to date. All people can do is offer their personal interpretations of these concepts and lay out their functions. Thus, leaving the medical research evidence of the opposite apart, one's logic should deny statements about the non-existence of the unconscious, which are nothing more than fear of the unknown.